A fresh translation/paraphrase into contemporary language and idiom by Eugene Peterson. (14) Why is the earlier Byzantine text more similar to the Alexandrian text in that it differs from the later Byzantine text in roughly 3000 places? We still observe people using 1 John 5:7 to prove the Trinity. 2:16, Col. 2:9). Was partially translated and released in various versions with the Douay-Rheims making up whatever books were not yet translated. If we investigated the translators of the KJV we may be surprised at what we would find. Please note that neither Westcott nor Hort believed that the Bible was Gods Word. And what do we know about these men who made themselves the judges over Gods holy Word? A textual critic sets himself up as judge over Gods Word, when no man has such a right. Both found nothing wrong with the worship of Mary. It follows the edition of Seligman Baer except for the books of Exodus to Deuteronomy, which never appeared in Baers edition. 1881 Westcott-Hort New Testament (WHNU) - BibleGateway What Can We Do to Establish Faith In the Restored Text of the New Testament? more concerned about showing that a translation 400 years old is in some way better than the ones we have today. What I write here is not an attack on the KJV it is an attempt to show how God continues to give us more knowledge and information which we must value and appreciate. I suppose I am a communist by nature. Riplinger, pg 624, Westcott our Bible as well as our Faith is a mere compromise. Riplinger, pg 625. These men were hereticks. It had nothing to do with it being the better text, i.e., the text that more accurately reflected the original. The text produced by Westcott and Hort is still to this day, even with so many more manuscript discoveries, a very close reproduction of the primitive text of the New Testament. When Westcott and Hort did their work, they found very little change had occurred to scriptures over the centuries. Generally speaking Wescott and Hort favored the Alexandrian text, which they called the "Neutral Text," namely based on the two chief 4th century witnesses Codex Vaticanus and . Heresies and blasphemies of Wescott & Hort - Jesus -is-Lord.com The point here is simple. These are commonly called the MINORITY TEXTS, but they are also known to many as the corrupted manuscripts. - Receive these reports by email The new Bible versions are not based on Erasmus' Textus Receptus. http://www.kjvonly.org/doug/index_doug.html, A superb debate between two Bible teachers one defending the KJV chaired by Doug Harris, founder of Reachout, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwe_nxeVwE0. The Westcott-Hort Greek text is very significant and its editors are highly significant to the history of textual criticism. Third, the size of Sinaiticus with the Old Testament, the New Testament, and apocryphal books, among other books would have weighed about 50+ lbs. An excellent link below explores this issue in more depth. The KJV is a translation like all others. (not fools for Christ, just fools!) () In many instances where I would disagree with the wording in the Nestle / UBS text in favor of a particular variant reading, I would later check with the Westcott and Hort text and realize that they had often come to the same decision. Psalm 23:1) chopped off the front.. Westcott did not have faith in Spiritualism, he had want of [(lack of)] faith in Spiritualism. (4) If there are no textual differences in the 4,000 Byzantine texts (which there are), what was the Word of God before the fifth-century Byzantine text of Codex Alexandrinus (400-440 A.D.)? Revised Version: RV: Modern English: 1885: Revision of the King James Version, but with a critical New Testament text: Westcott and Hort 1881 and Tregelles 1857 Even a brief comparison of passages between the NIV and KJV will yield useful information. (2.27, 29), The reading is less likely to be original that shows a disposition to smooth away difficulties (another way of stating that the harder reading is preferable). text (Erwin Nestle and Kurt Aland, Novum Testamentum Graece, 24th edition, 1960, p. 62). The book, New Age Bible Versions has this to say about Wescott and Hort: B.F. Westcott is identified as "a mystic" by the standard reference work of his day: The Encyclopedia Britannica (1911). To ignore these developments is to switch off our brains; now, we dont want to do that do we? The translation now is a literary masterpiece. Masoretic Text, the GreekNew Testament of Erasmus, Vulgate, and German and Swiss-German Bibles (Luther Bible,Zrich BibleandLeo Juds Bible), First complete Bible printed in English (Early Modern English). In his excellent history of the KJV, Gordon Campbell points out that the Geneva Bible, which preceded the KJV was used long after the KJV had been published by such notaries as Lancelot Andrewes, Richard Hooker, John Whitgift, and William Laud (Bible, p. 27, Oxford University Press, 2010). [7] The minuscules play a minimal role in this edition. Brooke Foss Westcott (an Anglican bishop and professor at Cambridge University) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (also an ordained priest and professor at Cambridge) produced a Greek New Testament in 1881 based on the findings of Tischendorf. My fatherceasedto interest himself in these matters, not altogether, I believe, fromwant offaith in what, for lack of a better name, one must call Spiritualism, but becausehe was seriously convinced that such investigations led to no good. (Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. 50+ premium resources (>$2,400 value!). Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition, Masoretic Text (Biblia Hebraica), Textus Receptus Greek text, Popular Messianic Translation by the Institute for Scripture Research, This version is based on a limited 3000 word vocabulary and everyday sentence structure it is also known as the Plain English Bible, the International English Bible, and the God Chasers Extreme New Testament. Ed.) And the 1611 KJV translators said in the 1611 PREFACE that a new revision should be made upon such circumstances. Things that we encourage you to share include the audio sermons, O Timothy magazine, FBIS articles, and the free eVideos and free eBooks. Readers of these new Bibles are quite unaware that they are reading the translation of a corrupt text. On one side, their supporters have heralded them as great men of God, having greatly advanced the search for the original Greek text. During the twentieth century, with the discovery of several New Testament manuscripts much older than any that had hitherto been available, it has become possible to produce editions of the New Testament that approximate ever more closely to what is regarded as the wording of the original documents.[5]. In their fourth argument, Burgon, Miller, and Scrivener maintained that the Byzantine text-type was actually older and superior to the Alexandrian text-type. However, Westcott and Hort's work was not perfect. Four volumes. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. (1) If Gods Word is only found in the 1611 KJV, where was Gods Word from 100 A.D. 1610 A.D.? As early as 1853 they began work on their Greek text of the New Testament: this project was . If we were to hand-copy the same manuscript a thousand times, obvious errors probably would be corrected in many copies, but new errors would be introduced, many of them probably the result of a well-intended correction. A textual criticism principle that has been derived from this observation is that manuscripts should be weighed (i.e. In 1853 these two Cambridge professors, Westcott and Hort, began to prepare a Greek Text based primarily on the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts. Westcott. Further, if we cannot demonstrate the Trinity without this one verse we need to learn to be better Bible students. On one side, their supporters have heralded them as great men of God, having greatly advanced the search for the original Greek text. As the old saying goes, Eat the meat. I observe, then, that while spiritual ministries are constantly recorded in the Bible, there is not the faintest encouragement to seek them. The Occult Connections of Westcott and Hort. They determined to replace the King James Bible and the Greek Textus Receptus. It should also be noted that the writings of John W. Burgon, Edward Hills, Benjamin C. Wilkinson will be greatly edifying. This Bible version is now Public Domain due to copyright expiration. I think his arguments are solid. Translations are not based on the previous translation and revised, which is the claim of Mormons, , they are based on the manuscripts available, this is an important point to, There are a number of theories about text types and families which have some intellectual and academic credibility. Many modern versions like the New International Version (450 million copies worldwide), English Standard Version, Holman Christian Standard Bible, New Living Translation, New Century Version, Amplified Bible, New English Translation and New American Standard Bible have been produced by the finest Bible believing scholars in the world. Westcott-Hort New Testament Greek-English Interlinear with Strong's numbers. God has promised to preserve His Word among us, and God always keeps His promises! Second, a number of old Byzantine and Western manuscripts are in good condition as well, which by this argument would indicate that they are also guilty of never having been read because they were full of errors, alterations, additions and deletions, so they would have had little chance of wear and tear. I, p.119), There are several problems with the claim as made by Chick and Riplinger. The two editors favoured two manuscripts: Vaticanus and Sinaiticus. God help you. But we must remember that Bibles are translated by men, and thus corruption is possible. CAN WE TRUST THE WESTCOTT AND HORT 1881 GREEK TEXT?: Were Westcott and Much of our material is available for free, such as the hundreds of articles at the Way of Life web site. OT:Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia. But HORT DID NOT FAIL TO REACH HIS MAJOR GOAL. Tobin Pederson, When it comes to the various Bible versions of our modern day, most readers assume that all Bibles are created equal, with perhaps differing degrees of readability. I have never personally come across anyone that actually believes it, but some scholars do. The text was also edited, with harmonized parallel accounts, grammar corrections, and abrupt transitions modified to produce a smooth text. I have used the NIV for comparison. There are, I fear, still more serious differences between us on the subject of authority, especially the authority of the Bible. Riplinger, pg 621, Hort [T]his may be cowardice I have sort of a craving that our text should be cast upon the world before we deal with matters likely to brand us with suspicion. THE DEAD HAND OF FENTON JOHN ANTHONY HORT LIES HEAVY UPON US. However the majority of these manuscripts agree with each other almost perfectly. . (Riplinger, New Age Bible Versions, p.407). They are based on the Greek New Testament compiled by a couple of heretic infidel blasphemers named Westcott and Hort (you will see this when you read their own words below). References in parentheses are to sections of HortsIntroduction, from which the principles have been extracted. This text type is called Byzantine and most of its copies can be sourced to Constantinople. Do we listen to the 5000+ witnesses, or do we listen to the 5? Sign up now for the latest news and deals from Bible Gateway! When Was It Written? They are anything but. I once saw a Christian rant and rave to some J, s and he quoted 1 John 5:7, 1 Tim 3:16 and said the KJV was the true Word of God, it was embarrassing and it reinforced. Thus, the idea of true believers wearing out manuscripts is ludicrous. Masoretic Text, Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament (based on Westcott-Hort, Weiss and Tischendorf, 1862). Revision of the Revised Standard Version. Since its publication in 1881, Westcott and Hort's work has proved to be impressively accurate, though far from perfect. He has been working in the apologetic area since his teens. Once we understand that we become aware of some of the shortcomings of the KJV. Textual Criticism. You will note it is not included in almost all modern translations. Westcott and Hort did what was unthinkable..they picked through five Greek texts which did not agree with each other, and came up with a new revised Greek version of the Bible. He has been a financial adviser for over 30 years. Masoretic Text,Textus Receptus, Tyndale 1526 NT, some Erasmus manuscripts, and Bezae 1598 TR. Our understanding of Hebrew and Greek has astronomically improved since 1611. Of course, the motivation behind the King James Version Onlyist would certainly argue otherwise. This was an early Catholic attempt to translate the Bible into English from the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek languages instead of from the Latin Vulgate. - "About" David Cloud But what does this mean and is it important? Revision of the New International Version. These differences are minor. You could say that Over five thousand witnesses agree, this New Testament is Gods holy Word. . Masoretic Text, various critical editions of the Greek text (i.a. No Christian truth is affected by any of the variations of translation due to textual differences. Are the Modern Versions Based on Westcott-Hort? The final conclusion here is simple, Westcott and Hort had some missteps spiritually as young men, they were not perfect as to their beliefs as young men, and they are under attack because they were the producers of the text that undermined the Textus Receptus that had been worshipped for centuries. Without thinking or looking deeper into the matter, they blindly assume that every Bible is the same. Believing that the KJV is the Gold Standard or even worse the Word of God. (2.28). This knowledge also informs us that the New Testament was not written generally in posh language more a sort of popular tabloid type language. It pays his bills and buys his books!! Masoretic Text, the Greek New Testament of Erasmus, the Vulgate, the Luther Bible, and a 1535 bible from France. Version Information. Now take your Bibles and look at Mark 16:9-20. Much has happened since then, including the discovery of 5000+ Greek manuscripts of the New Testament and, of course, the Dead Sea Scrolls! 118:8 Putting our confidence in God and not man, it seems apparent our Lord has kept His promise and that His Word is faithfully preserved in over 5000 witnesses! Assigns to each Greek word one unique English meaning. Comparable to theEnglish Standard Versionand theNew American Standard Bible. He is currently helping set up a bible college in Southern Africa . [9] It was followed by an Introduction and Appendix by Hort appearing in a second volume in 1882.

Joseph Shepard Net Worth, Where Was A House On The Bayou Filmed, Uncircumcised Jokes, Charles Donald Thomason, Property Management Jobs Near Illinois, Articles W